Essay on Imaginative Sculptures That Explore How We Perceive Reality

Nowadays, humanity perceives real life by using different ways. The development of technology has led to the emergence of effective methods of attracting attention and communication. For example, in this Ted Talk essay on the speech ”Imaginative Sculptures That Explore How We Perceive Reality” by Alicia Eggert, the author is sure that signs in the form of bright neon inscriptions are able to create a collective experience or understanding. Then, in the articles “Fictional Expectations in the Economy” by Jens Beckert and “Using Space, and Time to Encode Vibrotactile Information” by Scott Novich and David Eagleman, the authors state that people can perceive information through images or tactile contacts. However, Rene Marois and Johnson Ivanoff, which concerned the capabilities of the human brain, expressed another point of view in their article “Capacity Limits of Information Processing in the Brain.” Thus, a comparison of the concepts of scientists and the report of Alicia Eggert showed that the problem of perceiving reality requires the search for modern approaches, and such a solution as the use of imaginative sculptures is innovative and effective.

The Importance of Narrating Stories

Firstly, Alicia Eggert gives arguments by narrating some exciting episodes about her childhood. Living and studying in South Africa, she has been taught that “when people are able to find common ground and work together towards a mutual goal, powerful things can happen and so much more becomes possible” (Eggert 00:06:12-00:06:22). Real stories were her way of convincing the audience and achieving her goal. In the end, this strategy helped her gain the audience’s trust and appreciation.

The Future of People

Then, the story of the speaker shows that a sustainable future depends on how people interact. Besides, according to Beckert, the images of the future shape present decisions (4). The given examples helped the audience to get answers to the questions that arose during the lectures. In general, this method of presentation interested the audience.

Illustrative Signals

On the other side, the report’s main goal was to illustrate how signals affect the human understanding of the environment. The authors of neurobiological research submitted a similar way of communication as “information can be coded to the skin in a variety of manners” (Novich and Eagleman 2). To make sure of this, the audience was asked to imagine how they saw their future. Thus, it was obvious that Eggert interested the audience with her topic.

Perceiving the Information

Finally, the human experience is not only related to the actions. In other words, this aspect is predicted by the human brain because it is proclaimed to be of tremendous complexity and computational power (Marois and Ivanoff 296). Clearly, this feature gave a possibility to convey the main goal to the audience. At the same time, Eggert used her words wisely and spoke clearly, which helped viewers easily perceive information and draw right decisions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, humankind now perceives true life in different forms. The active positions of scientists helped to study the problem in detail. Also, signs in the form of neon inscriptions are modern decisions. Thus, research aimed at the development of technology will contribute to the transformation of the human perception of reality.

Works Cited

Beckert, Jens. “Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations in the Economy.” Theory and Society, vol. 42, no. 3, 2013, pp. 4-7, www.maxpo.eu/downloads/beckert-2.pdf.

Eggert, Alice. “Imaginative Sculptures That Explore How We Perceive Reality.” TED, 2019. www.ted.com/talks/alicia_eggert_imaginative_sculptures_that_explore_how_we_perceive_reality.

Novich, Scott, and David Eagleman. “Using Space and Time to Encode Vibrotactile Information: Toward an Estimate of the Skin’s Achievable Throughput.” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 233, no. 10, 2015, pp. 2777-2788. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4346-1.

Marois, Rene, and Jason Ivanoff. “Capacity Limits of Information Processing in the Brain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, 2005, pp. 296–305, www.faculty.washington.edu/jpalmer/files/forGB/NewRefs2/marois_ivanoff2005.pdf.