Argumentative, Exploratory, & Rhetorical Analysis Essays on “Death Penalty” – Wr1ter

Argumentative Essay Outline

Topic: Death Penalty

A student must follow a well-organized outline for writing an argumentative essay on “Death Penalty” to score higher grades.

I. Introduction

A. A catchphrase that makes an opening paragraph interesting. Basically, a first sentence must draw readers into an argumentative or persuasive essay.
B. A few sentences that provide background information on a persuasive argument being discussed.
C. A persuasive thesis statement that presents a main claim for a paper.

II. Body Paragraphs

A. Background Paragraph

• This writing paragraph should lay a foundation for providing an intended argument.
• One should include a summary of a chosen topic, definitions of terms, and an explanation of leading theories.

B. Supporting Paragraph – This paragraph should support an argumentative thesis statement. One should include:

• A topic sentence that responds to a central claim made in an introduction paragraph.
• Evidence that supports this central claim. In practice, the evidence may contain reasons, examples, facts, statistics, and quotations. Moreover, writers should provide an in-text citation to support the evidence presented.
• Students must include an accurate explanation of the evidence. In writing, suitable explanations explain how an intended audience should read and interpret the evidence provided in a text. Besides, an opinion-based explanation provided should prove a person’s point.
• This body paragraph should end with a concluding sentence that reasserts a topic sentence provided.

C. Opposing Paragraph – It is a counterargument paragraph that anticipates a reader’s opposition. Basically, authors should sound objective and reasonable when writing this paragraph. Hence, some of the elements one should include are:

• A topic sentence should state a possible counterargument that readers might pose against a thesis statement.
• People need to include objective evidence to support counterarguments.
• Explanations should provide reasonable and justifiable explanations that may help to understand this persuasive counterargument.
• This body paragraph should end with a sentence that reasserts a persuasive counterargument.

D. Refutation Paragraph – This writing paragraph reveals a specific weakness of a persuasive counterargument. Hence, some of the factors one should consider when refuting a persuasive counterargument are:

• A topic sentence states a specific weakness of a persuasive counterargument.
• The evidence presented should prove why this persuasive counterargument appears weak.
• Explanations should prove why a central argument holds when compared to a counterclaim.
• A concluding sentence reasserts an essay’s central argument.

III. Conclusion

A conclusion usually sums up main writing points discussed in an argumentative essay on “Death Penalty.” Hence, some of the points one should consider are:

• One should restate a paper’s overall claim and relevant supporting evidence.
• A conclusion paragraph should reflect a thoughtful and analytical understanding of a topic.
• A concluding section should not contain new evidence.

Important Points to Note:

Students should not limit an argumentative essay on “Death Penalty” to five paragraphs only. For example, a thesis statement should guide a specific length of an argumentative essay that one must write (Koons, 2021). Basically, a good essay on “Capital Punishment” may have several supporting and counterargument paragraphs. As such, the primary goal is to provide an exhaustive explanation of a main topic. In writing, one may also combine introduction and background information paragraphs. Besides, writers may decide to combine a counterargument and a refutation into one paragraph.

Exploratory Essay Outline and Template

Topic: Death Penalty

I. Introduction

A. An introduction should set a unique context for readers to understand a main topic. In this case, students should begin writing an exploratory essay on “Death Penalty” with a paragraph that gives the general background information. Besides, one should set up key ideas discussed throughout a paper.
B. An opening section should reveal an actual importance of a topic under evaluation. Basically, the presented details should motivate a target audience to read further. In writing, people should ensure an introduction creates a unique interest in reading a paper.
C. An introductory paragraph of an exploratory essay on “Death Penalty” should state a specific question or topic of exploration. In writing, one should use one or several sentences that give more information about intended goals. Besides, readers should find out “why” and “how” authors intend to explore it.

II. Body Paragraphs

A. A body section should have different paragraphs that focus on supporting a central claim of an argument. 
B. Each paragraph should give a detailed explanation of a source used. In writing, people should include a source’s information and explain why it sounds essential.
C. Each body paragraph should give a person’s reflection on a source and its information. 

III. Conclusion

A. A conclusion should give a general overview of critical concepts discussed.
B. Students should provide information that ties up loose ends. In writing, one should restate a main question and emphasize important points left out in body paragraphs.

Important Points to Note:

Learners should vary a body paragraph’s structure to enhance a mode of communication and main ideas. For example, writers should intend to communicate a main message instead of following a structure discussed previously strictly (Jones, 2024). Hence, they can change their body paragraphs in a way they want.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Outline and Template

Topic: Death Penalty

I. Introduction

A. Learners should identify an author of a source under analysis. In writing, students should use a positive phrase to establish an author’s reliability and expertise. Then, other essential details include a source’s title and a suitable rhetorical verb. Moreover, some of the unique verbs include “assert,” “argue,” “suggest,” “imply,” and “claim.” Finally, a first sentence should end with a “that” clause, which asserts its thesis statement. 
B. Writers should explain how an author develops or supports a thesis. Basically, this explanation should follow a chronological order to enhance an essay’s quality.
C. Students should include a statement that shows an author’s purpose for writing, followed by an “in order” phrase.
D. Scholars should describe an apparent relationship that a source’s author establishes with targeted readers.
E. A last sentence in an introduction paragraph contains an author’s central claim or thesis statement.

II. Body Paragraphs

A. Topic sentence – A first sentence in a paragraph contains claims about strategies that address its purpose or prompt.
B. Specific examples and supporting ideas – Students provide explicit textual support that supports their claims. In writing, they should discuss their examples thoroughly while providing supporting details. 
C. Discussion – Learners should discuss how provided examples support a central idea.
D. Concluding sentence – Students need to end each paragraph with a statement that sums up a single paragraph and connects an example to an introduction’s claim. 

III. Conclusion

A. Restating a thesis statement – Scholars must restate a thesis statement and dig deeper into a text’s overall intended meaning. Basically, this writing approach must help scholars to develop a deeper understanding than they establish in an opening paragraph.
B. Reflection – Learners should reflect on examples and main ideas discussed in an essay’s body. In turn, this aspect should state an actual meaning of primary persuasive strategies utilized in a source analyzed.
C. Effectiveness – People should state if persuasive strategies used effectively communicated an intended message.
D. Closing thoughts – Students should include final remarks that show a primary purpose of writing about a source under analysis.

Important Points to Note:

Learners should ensure rhetorical analysis papers show a source’s effectiveness in explaining a main argument. In writing, one should provide a seamless transition of ideas presented in a rhetorical analysis essay on “Death Penalty.” Moreover, topic sentences in second and subsequent body paragraphs should contain a transitioning statement (Rogers, 2024). In turn, this writing method helps to communicate an intended message without creating avoidable obstructions to readers.

Argumentative Essay on “Death Penalty”

Introduction

A death penalty issue remains a contested topic among scholars in the twenty-first century. Basically, legal experts give moral justification that supports an existence of legalized execution. However, people who advocate for human rights maintain that capital punishment lacks moral justification. Although scholars disagree on a death penalty’s legality, a current justice system provides necessary protocols to avoid convicted criminals’ inexcusable execution.

Body Paragraphs

Argument

A modern justice system of the United States provides necessary protocols to ensure that legalized execution promotes justice. For example, a current criminal justice system requires judges to sentence convicts found guilty of first-degree murder to a death sentence (Garrett & Kovarsky, 2018). In this case, the ruling in first-degree murder relies on objective evidence and a justifiable prosecution process. Besides, a convicted individual receives an opportunity to appeal. Hence, people charged with first-degree murder receive a death penalty after going through a fair legal process.

Counterargument

On the other hand, some people state that a death penalty practice does not meet moral justification. Basically, contenders maintain that executing a first-degree murderer fails to give a person a chance to change (Bows & Herring, 2020). Further on, capital punishment violates a convict’s fundamental right to life. However, such claims fail to consider that people charged with first-degree murder violated their fundamental rights. In turn, sentencing such people to death eliminates possible threats to public lives.

Conclusion

Though scholars disagree on a legality of a death penalty practice, criminal justice provides convicts with a chance to receive a fair hearing. In this case, a current justice system provides necessary protocols to avoid inexcusable execution. Thus, a counterargument presented fails to consider that first-degree murderers violate other people’s fundamental right to life. 

List of References

Bows, H., & Herring, J. (2020). Getting away with murder? A review of the ‘Rough Sex Defence.’ The Journal of Criminal Law, 84(6), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018320936777

Garrett, B., & Kovarsky, L. (2018). The death penalty. Foundation Press.

Defining Features

A second paragraph in writing an essay provided above contains a main persuasive claim. However, a third paragraph contains a counterargument and necessary refutations. Finally, a conclusion sums up main points presented in an argumentative essay on “Death Penalty.” In turn, this paper is only a writing example and does not force anyone to consider any position.

Exploratory Essay on “Death Penalty”

Introduction

Many scholars disagree on the most effective strategies that a modern criminal justice system should use to promote justice for first-degree murder victims. Different knowledge levels and personal interests influence such disagreements. Findings from recent research by Garrett and Kovarsky prove that creating awareness about capital punishment can reduce disagreements on an overall death penalty’s effectiveness.

Body Paragraph

The book “The Death Penalty” shows that disagreements about capital punishment’s legality and effectiveness arise due to various ignorance levels. For example, non-lawyer fails to access legal documents about legalized execution (Garrett & Kovarsky, 2018). In turn, this problem leads to higher ignorance levels, where scholars with inadequate knowledge of legal matters oppose capital punishment’s effectiveness. Therefore, the government can deal with such challenges by creating awareness about capital punishment and its purpose in the twenty-first century.

Conclusion

Though many experts oppose a legality and effectiveness of a death penalty, ignorance in legal matters remains a primary cause. In this case, non-lawyer scholars tend to oppose an application of capital punishment in promoting justice. Thus, creating public awareness can lead to a sustainable solution to the problem.  

Reference

Garrett, B., & Kovarsky, L. (2018). The death penalty. Foundation Press.

Defining Features

This example of writing an exploratory essay on “Death Penalty” consists of three paragraphs. However, a writing length of such a paper may be higher by considering necessary points needed to be discussed in a paper. Hence, writers may use as many paragraphs as they need to explore their topics.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay on “Death Penalty”

Introduction

The book “The Death Penalty,” authored by Garrett and Kovarsky, provides suitable explanations on capital punishment’s effectiveness in promoting justice. In particular, the authors use logos and pathos appeals to provide suitable explanations. Because Garrett and Kovarsky present details that appeal to readers’ reasoning and emotional senses, they justify a legality of using a death penalty sentence for first-degree murders. 

Body Paragraph

Garrett and Kovarsky rely on pathos and logos appeals to justify applying a death sentence in the United States. According to Garrett and Kovarsky (2018), criminal justice requires first-degree murderers to receive a death penalty sentence for violating a victim’s right to life. Basically, this statement appeals to reader’s emotions because it brings into context the rights of individuals killed in cold blood. In turn, Garrett and Kovarsky (2018) maintain that people convicted with legalized execution receive an opportunity to make their appeals before execution. Moreover, such claims appeal to a reader’s logic because all criminals have a chance to express themselves and seek intervention when they feel that a particular court violated their rights. Hence, Garrett and Kovarsky rely on healthy emotional and logical appeals to justify using a death penalty practice.

Conclusion

Though many thinkers disagree on capital punishment’s effectiveness, Garrett and Kovarsky use strong emotional and logical appeals to prove otherwise. In turn, these two authors present details that appeal to readers’ rational and emotional senses to justify a legitimacy of using a death penalty sentence for first-degree murders. As a result, a strategy motivates people to change their attitude toward a topic.

Reference

Garrett, B., & Kovarsky, L. (2018). The death penalty. Foundation Press.

Defining Features

A second paragraph shows a particular use of pathos and logos in a source identified. In writing, this body paragraph provides an accurate explanation of how two authors used rhetorical aspects to communicate a main idea. Besides, writing a given section relies on sensible evidence. In turn, a specific number of body paragraphs can be more than one, and it depends on person’s needs.